PAEDIATRIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE
sub-menu:


SUPERVISING COMMITTEE

OVERVIEW

Essentials of JTC

COMPONENTS OF TRAINING

Project Reports

Vocational Training
Paediatric Emergency Medicine
Supervising Committee
Joint Training Committee in Paediatric Emergency Medicine.
 
A PDF of the draft curriculum for Paediatric Emergency Medicine has been placed on the RACP Members website*.
*You will need to be a member of the RACP to access this section of the website, if you don't have a password to access the Members site you can register for access.

Overview and Purpose of the Training Program
The Advanced Training Program provides an opportunity for trainees to extend and further develop the range of knowledge, clinical/practical skills, attitudes and behaviours acquired during Basic/Provisional Training. At the end of advanced training they will have the knowledge and skills required to competently provide an effective, unsupervised and comprehensive program of patient diagnosis, care and management as a specialist in paediatric emergency medicine.

The advanced training program is a partnership between the Australasian College of Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP), the Joint Training Committee (JTC), the Trainee and their Supervisor(s), each of whom has various roles and responsibilities. The requirements for satisfactory completion of the advanced training program are specified by the Colleges and the JTC.

As adult learners, trainees will be required to proactively take responsibility for planning and managing their own training under the guidance and supervision of a more experienced clinician. Trainees will be expected to identify and utilise the full range of theoretical and practical learning opportunities available to them.

Upon satisfactory completion of the advanced training program, trainees are eligible to apply for admission as a Fellow of the relevant College, ACEM or RACP. Trainees seeking dual ACEM/RACP Fellowship are required to undertake further training. Following satisfactory completion of the additional requirements of the dual Fellowship training program, trainees are eligible to apply for admission as a Fellow of the relevant College.

Fellows will maintain their competence as practicing Physicians through a lifelong process of continuing professional development (CPD), which will enable them to maintain and further enhance their current knowledge and skills and to progressively develop new skills and levels of expertise.

Essentials of JTC (file size: 132KB)
JTC Site Accreditation Criteria for Tertiary PEM (file size: 45KB)

Hospitals Accredited for Advanced Training in Emergency Medicine
This document is available on the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine website in PDF format at:
http://www.acem.org.au/media/training/accredhosp.pdf

Components of Training
Project Reports
  • The purpose of preparing and submitting a project report in Paediatric Emergency Medicine is to learn and demonstrate the ability to:
    • pose a question and develop a proposal to answer the question,
    • search for, critically evaluate and synthesize information,
    • collect, manipulate and present quantitative or qualitative data,
    • write clearly and succinctly, and
    • evaluate the project.
  • Advanced trainees in Paediatric Emergency Medicine are required to prepare one project report.
  • The project reports must be in the form as outlined in the generic paediatric guidelines (see Advanced Training Projects in the General Information section). They must be original work and preferably be focused on paediatric emergency medicine.
  • Each project will be undertaken under supervision, either by the clinical supervisor or a separate project supervisor. The completed project report must be discussed with and evaluated by the supervisor before submission to the College.
  • The project may take the form of:
    • clinical or laboratory research presented in a form suitable or already submitted for publication to a peer-reviewed journal,
    • quality assurance project including literature review, diagnostic, intervention, implementation and sustainability components and involving data management.
  • A project may be part of a study conducted by a larger research team. To fulfil the requirements the trainee must have made a major contribution to study design, data collection, collation and presentation of results, statistical analysis, report writing and literature appraisal.
  • Successful completion of ACEM regulation 4.10.70 (publication/presentation of a paper) will substitute for the project report.
  • Retrospective case series, literature reviews and research proposals will not be considered appropriate.
  • The project must have been commenced by the end of the second year of advanced training, or entry to the third year of training will not be accepted.
  • Trainees who have been training under the supervision of other SACs and wish to train under the SAC in PEM will need to complete the project requirement for PEM as outlined above. A previous project may be submitted to the SAC for assessment against the criteria outlined above.
  • Project supervisors may contact a member of the SAC regarding suitability of a proposed project.
  • Other Project options outlined in the General Information section Advanced Training Projects, such as research proposals, retrospective case reviews and literature reviews do not fulfil all the learning objectives and are therefore not endorsed by SAC PEM as suitable projects. These types of endeavours will, however, still be encouraged during training as the SAC PEM considers them valuable educational tools.

Format of Project:
  • A project report should be of a format and standard suitable for presentation at a meeting of a national or international society or for publication in a peer reviewed journal.
  • The written project should be at least 2,000 words but not exceed 5,000 words.
  • Pages should be numbered and lines double-spaced.
  • The Title Page should contain the full title of the paper, names of other authors, institute where the work was conducted, name of the project supervisor, date of submission and whether project is part of a higher degree.
  • The Abstract should be structured and no more than 250 words, subdivided into the following sequential sections: objective; methodology; results; conclusions. Studies that do not easily conform to this subdivision may still be structured but the headings amended as appropriate. For case reports and review articles, unstructured, descriptive abstracts may be appropriate. The overall presentation should be similar to that for a journal article with introduction, patients and methods, results and discussion sections. The aim/objective/goal must be clearly stated.
  • The Introduction should be relatively brief and should outline the background of the study including the aims and hypotheses. Detailed literature reviews and discussion should be reserved for the discussion section.
  • Patients and Methods and all terms must be defined. Statistical methods should be presented entirely within the methods section.
  • The Results section should contain all the results. Results should not be included in the methods or discussion sections nor should discussion be included in the results section. Tables, figures and illustrations must be referred to in the text and have appropriate legends. Tables and figures should be readable and intelligible as 'stand-alone' items. Any figures and photographs should be labelled on the back. Photographs, results and any other patient material must be carefully screened to remove personal identification items.
  • The Discussion should be precise, logical and relevant to the particular study. Authors should compare their results with other studies and state what contribution the project makes to the existing literature and what the implications are for clinical practice. The discussion should include recommendations for future studies or directions. Limitations of the study (if any) should be mentioned.
  • There should be a concise conclusion paragraph.
  • The References must follow the Vancouver convention. http://www.icmje.org/.
  • Acknowledgments, either as a footnote to the text or on the front page, are to recognise contributions that fall short of authorship.
Project Assessment Form (file size: 43KB)
 

[ Table of Contents ]


 
  HOME  |  INTRODUCTION  |  BASIC TRAINING  |  EXAMINATIONS  |  ADVANCED TRAINING  |  CONTACTS  

Copyright 2003 © The Royal Australasian College of Physicians
This page was last edited: January 2008