Society of Obstetric Medicine of Australia and New Zealand

The Society of Obstetric Medicine of Australia and New Zealand (SOMANZ) aims to advance clinical and scientific knowledge of hypertensive diseases and medical disorders in pregnancy.

SOMANZ also fosters collaboration with other regional and international societies interested in hypertension in pregnancy and obstetric medicine. It is a Specialty Society affiliated with the RACP.

Download the Society of Obstetric Medicine of Australia and New Zealand's Top-5 recommendations (PDF)

Top-5 recommendations on low-value practices

1. Do not test for inherited thrombophilia for placental mediated complications.

Rationale and evidence

Rationale

While older retrospective studies suggested that inherited thrombophilia is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes such as stillbirth, recurrent miscarriage and placental abruption, more recent and more rigorous studies have either failed to find an association or have found only a weak association.

Moreover, the association is a moot point as there is now good quality evidence from randomised controlled trials that low-molecular-weight heparin does not significantly reduce the rate of placental mediated complications.

Evidence

Clark P, Walker ID, Langhorne P, et al. SPIN: the Scottish Pregnancy Intervention Study: a multicentre randomised controlled trial of low molecular weight heparin and low dose aspirin in women with recurrent miscarriage. Blood. 2010 May 27;115(21): 4162-7.

Rodger MA, Walker MC, Smith GN, et al. Is thrombophilia associated with placenta-mediated pregnancy complications? A prospective cohort study. J of Thrombosis & Haemostasis. 2014. 12: 469–784.

Rodger MA, Hague WM, Kingdom J, et al. Antepartum dalteparin versus no antepartum dalteparin for the prevention of pregnancy complications in pregnant women with thrombophilia (TIPPS): a multinational open-label randomised trial. Lancet. 2014 Nov 8;384(9955): 1673–83.

Said JM, Higgins JR, Moses EK, et al. Inherited thrombophilias and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a case-control study in an Australian population. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012 Feb;91(2): 250–5.

Silver RM, Saade GR, Thorsten V, et al. Factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A, and methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase mutations and stillbirth: the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(4): 468.e1-468.e17.


2. Do not do repeat testing for proteinuria in established pre-eclampsia.

Rationale and evidence

Rationale

Measuring proteinuria is useful as a diagnostic but not as a prognostic criterion for pre-eclampsia. This is because the level of proteinuria does not correlate with the severity of maternal complications in women with pre-eclampsia, nor are these levels useful in determining the timing of delivery. Thus, repeat testing for proteinuria in managing established pre-eclampsia is not recommended, particularly given the availability of superior prognostic models.

Evidence

Lowe SA, Brown MA, Dekker G. et al. SOMANZ guidelines for the management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. 2014.

Payne B, Magee LA, Côté AM, et al. PIERS proteinuria: relationship with adverse maternal and perinatal outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011;33(6): 588–97.

Thangaratinam S, Coomarasamy A, O’Mahony F, et al. Estimation of proteinuria as a predictor of complications of pre-eclampsia: a systematic review. BMC Med. 2009; 7:10.

von Dadelszen P, Payne B, Li J, Ansermino JM, et al. Prediction of adverse maternal outcomes in preeclampsia: development and validations of the fullPIERS model. Lancet. 2011; 377(9761): 219–27.


3. Do not undertake methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) polymorphism testing as part of a routine evaluation for thrombophilia in pregnancy.

Rationale and evidence

Rationale

Patients with the thermolabile variant of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) polymorphism are at higher risk of hyperhomocysteinaemia which has been associated with venous thrombosis. However, these associations appear to hold only in countries lacking grain products nutritionally fortified as a public health measure.

Moreover, homozygous variants are found in up to 15% of some populations, so that detection of this variant would lead to many women undergoing complex counselling unnecessarily and may also be a cause of distress. Polymorphism is not more prevalent in women with pregnancy-associated venous thromboembolism and testing for this polymorphism is not recommended as part of a routine evaluation for thrombophilia in pregnancy.

Evidence

Den Heijer M, Lewington S, Clarke R. Homocysteine, MTHFR and risk of venous thrombosis: a meta-analysis of published epidemiological studies. J Thromb Haemost 2005;3: 292–299.

Eldibany MM, Caprini JA. Hyperhomocysteinemia and thrombosis: an overview. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2007; 131: 872–884.

Holmes MV, Newcombe P, Hubacek JA, et al. Effect modification by population dietary folate on the association between MTHFR genotype, homocysteine, and stroke risk: a meta-analysis of genetic studies and randomised trials. Lancet. 2011;378: 584–594.

McLintock C, Brighton T, Chunilal S, et al. Recommendations for the prevention of pregnancy-associated venous thromboembolism. ANZJOG. 2012; 52: 3–13.


4. Do not measure erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in pregnancy.

Rationale and evidence

Rationale

Measuring the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is a non-specific test to identify inflammation. An elevated result indicates inflammation but does not indicate where it is in the body or the cause. The normal range outside of pregnancy in women aged 18 to 50 is <20mm/h.

One study found that levels varied from 4-70mm/hr and another found a range from 4-112mm/hr, with levels being affected by gestational age and haemoglobin concentration. This is likely to reflect normal changes in pregnancy, meaning that testing for an elevated ESR does not sufficiently differentiate between healthy pregnant women and those who may be suffering from inflammatory diseases.

Evidence

Abbassi-Ghanavati M, Greer LG, Cunningham FG. Pregnancy and Laboratory Studies: A Reference Table for Clinicians. Obstet Gynecol, 2009. 114: p. 1326–31.

van den Broe NR, Letsky EA. Pregnancy and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate. BJOG. 2001; 108(11): 1164-7.



Removal of recommendation | 2019

Original recommendation

Do not perform a D-Dimer test for the exclusion of venous thromboembolism during any trimester of pregnancy
Rationale

As D-Dimer levels are raised during pregnancy, they do not have a high positive predictive value for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pregnancy (i.e. they are unreliable for ruling in VTE in pregnancy). However, nor are they a reliable rule-out test for VTE. One study estimated the sensitivity of the D-Dimer test at 73 per cent, meaning that 27 per cent of patients with a negative D-Dimer had VTE. There have also been case reports of pregnant women with pulmonary embolism presenting with a negative D-Dimer. Therefore, there is no value in performing a D-Dimer test for the exclusion of venous thromboembolism at any trimester in pregnancy.

Evidence
  • Damodaram M, Kaladindi M, Luckit J, et al. D-dimers as a screening test for venous thromboembolism in pregnancy: is it of any use? Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2009; 29(2):101-32.
  • McLintock C, Brighton T, Chunilal S, et al. Recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in pregnancy and the postpartum period. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2012; 52(1):14-22.
  • To MS, Hunt BJ, Nelson-Piercy C. A negative D-Dimer does not exclude venous thromboembolism in pregnancy. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2008; 28(2):222-40.

Removal of the recommendation

Rationale

Recent studies have shown that using a D-Dimer in combination with a clinical algorithm can increase the reliability of D-Dimer testing in ruling out DVT and PE in pregnancy.

Furthermore, the alternative to D-Dimer tests for these purposes is the use of imaging tests, which have their own set of risks from radiation exposure. Where previous evidence which suggested D-Dimer testing was highly unreliable would have tipped the scales towards discouraging D-Dimer testing, the new evidence suggests the results of D-Dimer testing can be made more reliable. Thus, it is no longer apparent there would be strong benefits from discouraging the use of D-Dimer testing in these settings if the alternative is imaging.

At the 7 August 2019 meeting of the SOMANZ Council, it was agreed this recommendation be removed. The RACP Evolve team and the NPS MedicineWise Choosing Wisely Australia Clinical Lead also undertook a review. Due to this change in evidence, and physician support, this recommendation was officially removed in August 2019.

Evidence
  • Langlois E, Cusson-Dufour C, Moumneh T, et al. Could the YEARS algorithm be used to exclude pulmonary embolism during pregnancy? Data from the CT-PE-pregnancy study. J Thromb Haemost. 2019;17(8):1329-1334.
  • van der Pol LM, Tromeur C, Bistervels IM, et al. Pregnancy-Adapted YEARS Algorithm for Diagnosis of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism. N Engl J Med 2019; 380:1139-1149*.

 

Close overlay