AChSHM Exit Assessment

The Australasian Chapter of Sexual Health Medicine (AChSHM) Exit Assessment tests your integrated knowledge, clinical reasoning and professional practice in sexual health medicine.

Overview

Key dates

Applications open Tuesday 7 April 2026
Applications close 5pm AEDT, Tuesday 21 April 2026
Pre-exam special consideration requests close
(for provisions on exam day)
Tuesday 21 April 2026
Exam
Friday 10 July 2026
Exam day special consideration requests close
(for technical and procedural issues)
Wednesday 15 July 2026
Results released From 3pm AEST, Thursday 23 July 2026
Information is correct as of 24 February 2026.

Location

RACP Offices
Level 27, 1 O’Connell Street Sydney, NSW 2000

Plan your journey: public transportation | directions and parking


Risk management and contingency planning

In addition to quality assurance, a comprehensive risk management framework safeguards exam integrity and minimises disruptions. Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic have strengthened this framework, enhancing the ability to respond to unforeseen challenges.

Risk management plans outline strategies for mitigating potential disruptions and ensuring coordinated responses to unexpected events. Crisis communications support timely updates, and contingency plans outline alternative exam delivery methods if required.

These plans are reviewed before each exam cycle and published on our website for transparency. Through proactive risk management and rigorous quality assurance, we remain committed to upholding the highest assessment standards, providing candidates and stakeholders with confidence in the exam process.

Plan A | The AChSHM Exit Assessment will proceed as scheduled on Friday, 10 July 2026.

The exam will occur in a face-to-face format on a single day at the RACP Head Offices in Sydney, NSW. Trainees from across Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand attend at an allocated time during the scheduled exam day.

Plan B | If the exam can't be delivered as planned on Friday, 10 July 2026 due to unforeseen circumstances, the exam will be postponed and will proceed within 3 months for all candidates.

Recommendations from the Review of the Paediatric Clinical Examination in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand are being implemented to enhance exam safety for candidates, examiners, patients and their families/whānau/carers.




Exam format overview

The exam is an interview-style structure consisting of 2, 30-minute sessions. You discuss 4 questions in each session, 8 questions in total.

View the Prepare and Exam day tabs for more detailed information on the content and processes of the exam day.


Exam development

The exam content is developed by the Exit Assessment Working Party using processes designed to support validity, reliability and fair representation of the scope of sexual health medicine practice. Topics are planned in advance and mapped to the Sexual Health Medicine Curriculum to ensure appropriate coverage of learning objectives and equitable assessment across trainee cohorts. The Working Party is composed of experienced Fellows selected to reflect diversity of expertise, geography and practice context, including representation from Aotearoa New Zealand.

Working Party members collaboratively develop questions and marking guides, engaging in structured peer review to refine clinical accuracy, clarity and scoring intent. These stages reduce the risk of item-writing bias, improve scoring consistency and strengthen content validity.

Following development, questions undergo technical editing and formal review to confirm internal consistency, alignment with assessment standards and overall suitability for inclusion in the exam. Final proofreading and approval processes ensure that each component meets the required performance expectations before materials are prepared for exam delivery.


Performance standard criteria

The Exit Assessment uses criterion-referenced judgement, meaning performance is evaluated against defined expectations of practice rather than compared with other candidates. This approach ensures that all candidates who demonstrate the required standard are able to pass.

Performance expectations are defined through structured assessment criteria and marking guides applied across all questions. Examiners assess candidate performance independently and then participate in a formal results discussion to confirm overall outcomes. This process supports consistent interpretation of the required standard and ensures that final decisions reflect demonstrated performance across the assessment.

Final pass–fail outcomes are confirmed through established exam governance and quality assurance processes, supported by independent review of de-identified results. These processes promote fairness, transparency and defensible decision-making across the exam.


Marking

Each question is assessed independently by 2 examiners using structured marking guides and rating frameworks developed for the Exit Assessment. These tools support consistent evaluation of the accuracy, relevance and completeness of each candidate’s responses.

Examiners review their assessments together and determine an overall performance outcome for each question. Where required, established review processes ensure that outcomes remain fair, consistent and aligned with the expected standard of professional practice.

Final results are determined using criterion-referenced standards based on structured examiner evaluation of performance. Exam governance and quality assurance processes support accurate, transparent and defensible decision-making.


Quality assurance

A robust quality assurance framework governs the exams to ensure fairness, accuracy and consistency across all assessments.

From planning and development through to topic selection, question design, examiner recruitment and calibration, stringent measures uphold rigorous assessment standards.

Data integrity is prioritised through comprehensive quality checks before results are finalised, while results meetings and ratification procedures provide additional oversight, particularly for candidate results close to the minimum expected standard and for any unforeseen circumstances that may impact outcomes.

Clear and timely communication ensures transparency for candidates and stakeholders, and structured feedback mechanisms support continuous improvement of future assessments.

Results

You'll receive your exam results by email. Ensure your contact details are up to date in MyRACP, including your current email address and phone number. If you don't receive your result, contact us for assistance.

To ensure fairness, accuracy, and integrity, results undergo the following quality assurance process: 

Responsive Table
Steps post-exam dayDescription
Exam data collectionScores are submitted by examiners.
Data verificationChecking for anomalies and data comparison.
RACP exam analysisData quality assurance review by Senior Lead, Assessment, and Data Analyst. 
Results meetingDiscussion of candidate exam results and decision on incidents and post-exam special consideration applications. All candidate details are de-identified.
Results confirmationConfirmation of results for release.
Results administrationsFinal preparation of results for release.
Results release
Results are typically released mid-week and before end of day to ensure that candidates can access support within business hours.

Note: The Reconsideration Review and Appeals By-law (PDF) apply exclusively to decisions made by College bodies and doesn't apply to exams results, as these reflect outcomes for assessments against established criteria rather than discretionary decisions.


Candidate Feedback

All candidates receive a copy of the general feedback, which provides a cohort-based overview of key strengths and areas for improvement, summarised by examiners at the end of the exam.

See previous years' AChSHM feedback report (member login required):

Unsuccessful candidates receive written feedback on their overall performance and on each exam question. This feedback is prepared following the exam and is based on the assessment information recorded during the marking and results-determination process. Successful candidates don't receive individual written feedback.

You're encouraged to discuss your results with your Advanced Training Supervisor or mentor, who can help you reflect on your performance, recognise your strengths, and identify areas for continued development.

To support equitable access and consistency for all candidates, we run candidate information sessions that provide guidance on the exam, preparation strategies and related processes, with opportunities for questions.


Next steps

To gain Fellowship of the Australasian Chapter of Sexual Health Medicine, you must pass this exam and complete all other Sexual Health Medicine program requirements.

Refer to the Progression Through Training Policy and the Sexual Health Medicine Training program.

Close overlay