AFPHM Oral Examination

The Australasian Faculty of Public Health Medicine (AFPHM) Oral Examination tests your ability to respond to real-life public health scenarios, as expected of a public health medicine specialist.

Overview

Key dates 


DescriptionDate
Applications open9am AEST, Monday 15 June 2026
Applications close5pm AEST, Monday 29 June 2026
Exam date Tuesday 13 October 2026
Wednesday 14 October 2026
Thursday 15 October 2026*
Special Consideration  
Pre-exam applications close
(for provisions on exam day)

5pm AEST, Monday 29 June 2026. 

Refer to Appendix A of the Special Consideration for Assessment Policy (PDF)

Special Consideration for Assessment Application form (PDF) 

Exam day/post-exam applications close
(for technical and procedural issues)

 5pm AEDT, Monday 19 October 2026

Refer to Appendix A of the Special Consideration for Assessment Policy (PDF)

Special Consideration for Assessment Application form (PDF)

Results releasedFrom 3pm AEDT, Thursday 29 October 2026
Information is correct as of 5 June 2026.

Important note: Thursday, 15 October is a contingency date only and is dependent on higher-than-expected candidate numbers.

Location

RACP Offices
Level 27, 1 O’Connell Street Sydney, NSW 2000

Plan your journey: public transportation | directions and parking









Risk management and contingency planning

In addition to quality assurance, a comprehensive risk management framework safeguards exam integrity and minimises disruptions. Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic have strengthened this framework, enhancing the ability to respond to unforeseen challenges.

Risk management plans outline strategies for mitigating potential disruptions and ensuring coordinated responses to unexpected events. Crisis communications support timely updates, and contingency plans outline alternative exam delivery methods if required.

These plans are reviewed before each exam cycle and published on our website for transparency. Through proactive risk management and rigorous quality assurance, we remain committed to upholding the highest assessment standards, providing candidates and stakeholders with confidence in the exam process.

Additionally, recommendations from the Review of Paediatric Clinical Examination in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand are being implemented to enhance exam safety for candidates, examiners, patients, and their families/whānau/carers.

To find out more, read the Review of Paediatric Clinical Examination in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand.

Plan A: The exam is scheduled to take place in person on 13, 14 and 15 October 2026 at the RACP Sydney Office. Trainees from across Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand will attend the RACP Offices at a designated time and date during the scheduled exam days. If we receive more applications than expected, the contingency date will be Thursday 15 October 2026.

Plan B: If the exam on 13-15 October 2026 can't take place due to unforeseen circumstances, it will be postponed for at least 3 months for all candidates.


Exam format overview

The exam is a presentation-style structure consisting of 2, 30-minute sessions. You discuss 4 questions in each session, 8 questions in total. You have 1-hour preparation time before the first session, and 20 minutes revision time before the second session.

The Prepare and Exam Day tabs provide detailed information on the content and processes of the exam day.


Exam development

Content for the AFPHM Oral Examination is developed by a dedicated working party of experienced Fellows using structured processes designed to support validity, reliability and fair representation of public health medicine practice. Question topics are selected to ensure appropriate coverage of the breadth of competencies expected at progression to Fellowship and to support equitable assessment across candidates.

Working party members collaboratively develop scenario-based questions and structured answer guides, applying iterative peer review to refine clarity, relevance and assessment intent. Questions are designed to reflect real-world public health situations and to assess practical problem-solving, judgement and application of knowledge using established public health frameworks. These processes strengthen content validity, reduce bias and support consistent interpretation of candidate performance.

Following development, questions and answer guides undergo formal review and quality assurance before approval for use in the examination. Final checks confirm alignment with assessment standards and ensure that the exam content is appropriate for defensible, high-stakes decision-making.


Performance standard criteria

The AFPHM Oral Examination uses criterion-referenced judgement, meaning performance is evaluated against defined expectations of public health medicine practice rather than compared with the performance of other candidates. This approach ensures that all candidates who demonstrate the required standard are able to pass.

Performance expectations are defined through structured assessment criteria and answer guides applied across all examination questions. Examiners independently evaluate each candidate’s responses and then participate in a formal results discussion to confirm overall outcomes. Examiners also undertake structured calibration activities before the examination to develop a shared understanding of the required standard and consistent approaches to marking.

Final pass–fail outcomes are confirmed through established examination governance and quality assurance processes, supported by independent review of de-identified results. These processes promote fairness, transparency and defensible decision-making in this high-stakes assessment.


Marking

Your response to each question is awarded a score out of 10, independently by 3 examiners. The examiners consider to what extent you:

  • address relevant aspects of the question
  • demonstrate understanding of the relevant issues
  • demonstrate a sound knowledge base
  • present an answer in a structured and coherent manner
  • illustrate conceptual issues with relevant practical examples

To ensure consistency in marking, examiners work to a set of criteria for each answer.

All 8 questions are weighted equally and marked out of 10. Each question may comprise several sub-questions, and the sub-questions may have different weightings.

To pass a question:

  • 2 of the 3 examiners must award a score of 5 or above, and
  • the average score awarded by the 3 examiners must be 5 or above

To pass the exam, you must:

  • score an average of 60% or above across all questions, and
  • pass 6 or more questions

Or

  • score an average of 58% or above across all questions, and
  • pass all 8 questions

See previous exam pass rates


Quality assurance

A robust quality assurance framework governs the exams to ensure fairness, accuracy and consistency across all assessments. Each stage of the exam process follows detailed business rules tailored to the exam’s purpose, format and potential risks.

From planning and development with relevant committees through to topic selection, question design, examiner recruitment and calibration, stringent measures uphold rigorous assessment standards.

Data integrity is prioritised through comprehensive quality checks before results are finalised, while results meetings and ratification procedures provide additional oversight, particularly for candidate results close to the minimum expected standard and for any unforeseen circumstances that may impact outcomes.

Clear and timely communication ensures transparency for candidates and stakeholders, and structured feedback mechanisms support continuous improvement of future assessments.


Results

You receive your exam result by email. Ensure your contact details are up to date in MyRACP , including your current email address and phone number. If you do not receive your result email, contact us for assistance.

To ensure fairness, accuracy, and integrity, results undergo the following quality assurance process:

Responsive Table
Post-exam stepsDescription
Exam data collectionScores are submitted by examiners.
Data verificationChecking for anomalies and data comparison.
RACP exam analysisData quality assurance review by Senior Lead, Assessment, and Data Analyst.
Initial results briefingSenior Lead briefs the Chief Examiner, Deputy Chief Examiner and QA on the initial exam results and data quality.
Results meetingDiscussion of results and borderline moderation. All candidate details are de-identified.
Results confirmationPost-exam special consideration applications reviewed by the Faculty Assessment Committee. Confirmation of results for release by the Faculty Assessment Committee. 
Results administrationsFinal preparation of results for release.
Results releaseResults are typically released mid-week and before end of day to ensure that candidates can access support within business hours.
Note: The Reconsideration, Review and Appeals By-Law (PDF) applies exclusively to decisions made by College bodies and does not apply to exam results, as these reflect outcomes of assessments against established criteria rather than discretionary decisions.

Candidate feedback

Unsuccessful candidates receive written feedback outlining their overall performance and their performance on each exam question. This feedback is prepared following the exam and is based on the assessment information recorded during the marking and results-determination process. Successful candidates do not receive individual written feedback.

You're encouraged to discuss your results with your Advanced Training Supervisor or mentor, who can help you reflect on your performance, recognise your strengths and identify areas for continued development.

To support equitable access and consistency for all candidates, we provide candidate information sessions that include guidance on the examination, preparation strategies and related processes, with opportunities for questions.


Next steps

To gain Fellowship of the Australasian Faculty of Public Health Medicine, you must pass this exam and successfully complete all training program requirements.

Refer to the eligibility criteria and exam attempts in the Progression Through Training Policy and the Public Health Medicine Training Program handbook.

Close overlay