DWE October 2025

Overview

The Divisional Written Examination (DWE) is comprised of 2 papers designed to assess your understanding of basic science and your clinical knowledge.

To sit the exam, you need to meet the eligibility requirements. Find these on the Apply tab.

Key dates 

Key dates

Australia

Aotearoa New Zealand

Applications open 10am AEST, Wednesday, 28 May 2025 10am NZST, Wednesday, 28 May 2025
Applications close 5pm AEST, Wednesday, 18 June 2025 5pm NZST, Wednesday, 18 June 2025
Exam date Tuesday, 21 October 2025 Tuesday, 21 October 2025
Special Consideration  
Pre-exam applications close 5pm AEDT, Monday, 6 October 2025. Refer to Appendix A of the Special Consideration for Assessment Policy (PDF)  5pm NZDT, Monday, 6 October 2025. Refer to Appendix A of the Special Consideration for Assessment Policy (PDF) 
Exam day/post-exam applications close 5pm AEDT, Tuesday, 28 October 2025              5pm NZDT, Tuesday, 28 October 2025             
 Proposed results released 3pm AEDT, Thursday, 20 November 2025
 3pm NZDT, Thursday, 20 November 2025

Exam development

The exam is created through a comprehensive, multi-step process to ensure that all questions effectively assess the required knowledge and skills. The Adult Medicine and Paediatrics & Child Health exams are developed in line with exam blueprints, which outline the expected distribution of questions across specialties. These blueprints are available on the Prepare tab.

Item Writing Panels (IWPs) meet 3 times a year for Adult Medicine and 2 times a year for Paediatrics & Child Health to write and review potential exam questions. Each panel includes over 20 specialists who help write and approve new questions.

Every question is discussed and reviewed by the panel—no question is written or approved by just 1 person. The IWP considers the clinical accuracy, clarity, and relevance of each question, and not all questions are approved for use. Only questions that meet the required standards move to the next stage of quality assurance for possible inclusion in the exam.

The Chairs of the IWPs and the Written Examination Committee work closely with our Assessment Services team to create the final papers. A proportion of previously validated questions, or items with demonstrated psychometric strength, are included in each paper to serve as ‘anchors’ during exam analysis, ensuring consistent exam difficulty across sittings.

Performance standard criteria 

Standard-setting processes ensure that all candidates are assessed fairly and consistently. The exams use criterion-referenced methods, meaning that candidate performance is measured against pre-determined standards rather than compared to other candidates. This ensures that all candidates who meet the required standard can pass. Bell curves and fixed passing quotas aren't used. 

The pass mark for the exam is determined using the Modified Angoff method, a widely accepted approach based on expert judgment of item difficulty. A panel of experienced Fellows estimates the likelihood that a minimally competent candidate would answer each question correctly. These ratings are aggregated to establish the cut score. A full-paper calibration using this method is conducted every 5 years. Historically, the pass mark has ranged between 55% and 65%. 

To ensure fairness and consistency between examination sittings, psychometric analysis using the Rasch model (an item response theory model) is applied. This anchors the cut score to previously used questions, stabilising difficulty across cycles. 

Marking 

The exam consists of 170 multiple-choice questions. Each correct answer is awarded 1 mark. There are no penalties for incorrect answers, and your final score is the sum of marks across both papers. It's not necessary to pass each paper separately. 

All answer sheets are scanned independently by 2 external scanning companies to ensure accuracy. If discrepancies or ambiguities are detected during the scanning process, papers are reviewed by a human marker. 

Each exam includes a combination of newly developed and previously used questions. Previously used questions contribute to your total score and play a key role in equating exam difficulty. After every exam all questions across both the primary and reserve papers undergo statistical analysis to identify anomalies, such as multiple correct answers, ambiguous wording, or extreme difficulty. The Written Examination Committee reviews any flagged questions and only excludes them from scoring if doing so enhances the validity of the exam.  

Results

Results will be available on the Basic Training Portal and sent to your email. For confidentiality reasons, results will not be discussed over the phone or by email. 

Directors of Physician or Paediatric Education (DPEs) will receive an email the same day with a list of their trainees' names and results.

To ensure fairness, accuracy, and integrity, results undergo a rigorous quality assurance process: 

Responsive Table
Steps post-exam day Description
Exam data collection Scanning and processing answer sheets, with double verification by external companies.
Data verification Checking for anomalies and data comparison.
RACP item analysis Review of item statistics by Psychometrician and Data Analyst.
Item review by SMEs Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) review flagged items.
Item analysis meeting Discussion and finalisation of item decisions.
Cut-score determination Establishing the final passing threshold. All AM and PCH Written Examination Committee members are invited as observers of the discussion.
Results confirmation Confirmation of results for release.
Results administrations Final preparation of results for release.
Results release Results are typically released mid-week to ensure candidates can access College support if needed.

To protect the integrity of scoresheets, robust security and quality assurance processes are in place. All scoresheets are photocopied before leaving the exam venue and are securely transported via person-to-person courier from each site. Upon arrival, the exam management supplier conducts thorough checks to confirm that all scoresheets have been received and reconciled against trainee attendance records. While every effort is made to work efficiently, these steps are critical to ensuring the fairness, accuracy, and reliability of results. See more about past Divisional Written Examination results.

Candidate feedback

The feedback after the exam helps candidates and DPEs understand performance and identify areas for improvement. It's usually provided within 4 weeks of the release of exam results. 

Feedback for candidates
  • Candidates receive a personalised report that breaks down their results by curriculum-linked topic areas, indicating the number of items in each area and the number answered correctly.
Feedback for DPEs
  • DPEs receive a summary report that include:
    • candidate performance by topic area
    • performance by training setting, state or territory
    • overall exam averages
  • Training hospital-level summaries for all candidates in their setting, which supports targeted educational planning.

Note: Reports are only issued where candidate numbers are sufficient to ensure de-identified data.

Quality assurance

A robust quality assurance framework governs the exam to ensure fairness, accuracy, and consistency across all assessments. Each stage of the exam process follows detailed business rules tailored to the exam’s purpose, format, and potential risks. From planning and development with relevant committees to item creation, stringent measures uphold rigorous assessment standards. 

Data integrity is prioritised through comprehensive quality checks before results are finalised, while results meetings and ratification procedures provide additional oversight, particularly for candidate results close to the minimum expected standard, and whether there have been unforeseen circumstances that may impact outcomes. Clear and timely communication ensures transparency for both candidates and stakeholders, while structured feedback mechanisms continuously refine future assessments. 

Risk management

In addition to quality assurance, we maintain a comprehensive risk management framework to safeguard exam integrity and minimise disruptions. Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic have strengthened this framework, enhancing our ability to respond to unforeseen challenges. 

Our risk management plans include strategies for mitigating potential disruptions, ensuring coordinated responses to unexpected events. A crisis communications plan facilitates timely updates, while contingency plans outline alternative examination delivery methods if required. 

These plans are reviewed before each exam cycle.  Through proactive risk management and rigorous quality assurance, we remain committed to upholding the highest assessment standards, providing candidates and stakeholders with confidence in the exam process. 

As part of our ongoing safety and quality improvements, we're implementing recommendations from the Review of Paediatric Clinical Examination in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand for all Assessments. This aims to enhance safety for candidates, examiners, patients, and their families/whānau/carers. To learn more, read the Review of Paediatric Clinical Examination in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand.

Contingency plans

Contingency plans are in place in case significant events or disruptions prevent the October 2025 Divisional Written Examination from going ahead. The available contingency options may be applied to an individual exam site or multiple impacted sites. The safety of all participants is at the core of these plans.

Ensure your contact details are up to date, including your mobile phone number. You can check or update your contact details by logging into MyRACP and clicking on the 'My details' tile. If there are any changes in timings or other issues impacting your exam location on the day, you'll receive an SMS and an email with relevant updates and detailed information. Ensure your contact information is correct so we can reach you directly.

Plan A | The Divisional Written Examination will proceed as scheduled as a paper-based exam at exam centres across Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand.

Plan B | If significant events or disruptions prevent the October DWE from going ahead at one or multiple exam venues, impacted trainees will be offered a full refund and will be able to register for the February DWE the following year.


Support

Preparing for exams can be stressful. Reach out to the RACP Support Program for free, 24/7, completely confidential support. Make an appointment or speak with a consultant by calling 1300 687 327 (Australia) or 0800 666 367 (Aotearoa New Zealand).

The Training Support Unit is here to support your progress through your examinations. The Training Support Unit will be in contact with you to offer support and provide important information shortly after you register for the final attempt of your exam. If you're not on your final attempt of an exam and would like support from the Training Support Unit, contact us via email trainingsupport@racp.edu.au for Australian Candidates or trainingsupport@racp.org.nz for Aotearoa New Zealand candidates.

Close overlay