AFOEM Stage B Written Examination

The Stage B Written Examination tests your knowledge in Occupational and Environmental Medicine through scenario based, short answer responses.

Overview

Assessment changes

There are no changes to the 2026 Stage B Written Examination purpose, focus or format.

Trainees who start in 2026 will follow the new Occupational and Environmental Medicine curriculum and are required to successfully complete the AFOEM Consolidation Written Examination instead of the AFOEM Stage B Written Examination.

The Faculty Assessment Committee has established a working group to align the new Consolidation Written Examination to the new Occupational and Environmental Medicine curriculum and Learning, Teaching and Assessment (LTA) program and define its purpose, focus and format.

Any changes to exam requirements will be communicated by the end of 2026. 


Key dates

DescriptionDate
Applications open9am AEST, Monday 15 June 2026
Applications close5pm AEST, Monday 29 June 2026
Exam date Saturday 5 and Sunday 6 September 2026
Special Consideration  
Pre-exam applications close
(for provisions on exam day)

5pm AEST, Monday 29 June 2026

Refer to Appendix A of the Special Consideration for Assessment Policy (PDF)

Special Consideration for Assessment Application form (PDF) 

Exam day/post-exam applications close
(for technical and procedural issues)

5pm AEST, Thursday 10, September 2026

Refer to Appendix A of the Special Consideration for Assessment Policy (PDF)

Special Consideration for Assessment Application form (PDF)

Results releasedFrom 3pm AEDT, Thursday 8 October 2026
Information is correct as of 10 June 2026. 

Location 

Venues are located in Australian and Aotearoa New Zealand capital cities and major regional centres, selected at our discretion.  

Exam locations will be confirmed after applications close. 


Risk management and contingency planning

In addition to quality assurance, a comprehensive risk management framework safeguards exam integrity and minimises disruptions. Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic have strengthened this framework, enhancing the ability to respond to unforeseen challenges.

Risk management plans outline strategies for mitigating potential disruptions and ensuring coordinated responses to unexpected events. Crisis communications support timely updates, and contingency plans outline alternative exam delivery methods if required.

These plans are reviewed before each exam cycle and published on our website for transparency. Through proactive risk management and rigorous quality assurance, we remain committed to upholding the highest assessment standards, providing candidates and stakeholders with confidence in the exam process.

Additionally, recommendations from the Review of Paediatric Clinical Examination in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand are being implemented to enhance exam safety for candidates, examiners, patients, and their families/whānau/carers.

To find out more, read the Review of Paediatric Clinical Examination in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand.

Plan A | The AFOEM Stage B Written Examination will proceed as scheduled on Saturday 5 - Sunday 6 September 2026. The exam will be delivered using Paper Based Testing at exam centres across Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. 

Plan B | If one or more exam locations are unable to deliver the exam on Saturday 5 - Sunday 6 September due to unforeseen circumstances, the exam will proceed at all other locations. If September is not feasible in an exam centre, the exam will take place a minimum of 3 months later at impacted exam locations.


Exam format overview 

The exam consists of 2 papers (Paper 1 and Paper 2) split over 2 consecutive days.  

Each paper has 5 equally-weighted questions, each question includes a variable number of sub-questions. 

The Prepare and Exam Day tabs provide detailed information on the content and processes for each paper. 


Exam development

The exam content is developed through a structured, multi-stage process designed to ensure that questions accurately and reliably assess the targeted knowledge and skills. Exam content is developed in alignment with approved exam blueprints, which define the intended coverage across relevant domains and specialties. 

Questions are written and reviewed by a working party of subject matter experts. Each scenario and question undergoes collective review to evaluate clinical accuracy, clarity, relevance and alignment with the intended assessment outcomes. No question is written or approved by a single individual and only those that meet the required standards progress through quality assurance processes for potential inclusion in the exam. 

Final exam papers are assembled through collaboration between the working party leads, relevant committees and RACP staff. Once submitted to the RACP, questions undergo technical editing and further review to confirm internal consistency, alignment with assessment standards, and overall suitability for inclusion in the examination. Final proofreading, approval and standard-setting processes ensure that each question meets the required performance expectations before materials are prepared for examination delivery. 


Performance standard criteria

Performance standard criteria Standard-setting processes ensure that all candidates are assessed fairly and consistently. The examination uses criterion-referenced judgement, meaning performance is evaluated against defined expectations of occupational and environmental medicine practice rather than compared with the performance of other candidates. This approach ensures that all candidates who demonstrate the required standard are able to pass.

The required standard is established using a recognised standard-setting approach: the Modified Angoff method. A panel of diverse subject matter experts who are familiar with the training environment review every question on the examination to estimate the probability that a minimally competent candidate would answer them correctly. The standard to pass the examination is the aggregate average of these judgements. This approach is used to determine the pass mark for each scenario


Marking 

The exam consists of 10 equally weighted questions across Papers 1 and 2, each containing several sub-questions. Marks are not deducted for incorrect answers. 

Each question is marked independently by a pair of subject matter experts using a pre-determined marking guide. The examiners then review their scores together to agree on a final mark, and all questions are subsequently reviewed through faculty quality assurance processes. Item analysis is conducted to confirm that questions perform as expected. 

The pass mark is set using the Modified Angoff method. Subject matter experts estimate the score that a candidate performing at the required standard would achieve on each question, and these estimates are combined to determine the overall pass mark for the exam. As a result, the pass mark may vary between exam sittings depending on overall paper difficulty. 

Exam data are reviewed before results are released. As part of quality assurance, questions that do not perform as expected may be removed and the pass mark adjusted accordingly to ensure fair and reliable outcomes. 

See previous exam pass rates


Quality assurance

A robust quality assurance framework governs the exams to ensure fairness, accuracy and consistency across all assessments. Each stage of the exam process follows detailed business rules tailored to the exam’s purpose, format and potential risks.

From planning and development with relevant committees through to scenario and question selection, item creation, marker recruitment and training, stringent measures uphold rigorous assessment standards.

Data integrity is prioritised through comprehensive quality checks before results are finalised, while results meetings and ratification procedures provide additional oversight, particularly for candidate results close to the minimum expected standard and for any unforeseen circumstances that may impact outcomes.

Clear and timely communication ensures transparency for candidates and stakeholders, and structured feedback mechanisms support continuous improvement of future assessments.


Results

You’ll receive your exam result by email. Your Advanced Training Supervisor and Director of Training are copied on the email. Ensure your contact details are up to date in MyRACP, including your current email address and phone number. If you don't receive your result email, contact us for assistance. 

To ensure fairness, accuracy and integrity, results undergo the following quality assurance process:

Responsive Table
Steps post-exam dayDescription
Answer sheet data collectionScanning and processing of answer sheets, with double verification by external companies.
Paper marking 
Markers convene to complete training and marking of candidate answer sheets against pre-determined marking guides. A pair of markers first individually mark an assigned question scenario, then come together to discuss and agree on a consensus score for each question.  
Data collectionProcessing of consensus score sheets.
Data verificationChecking for anomalies and data comparison.
RACP item analysisReview of item statistics by internal experts.
Item review by SMEsSubject Matter Experts (SMEs) review flagged items.
Item analysis meetingDiscussion and finalisation of item decisions.
Cut-score determination Establishing the final pass threshold.
Results meetingDiscussion of candidate exam results and decisions on incidents and post-exam special consideration applications. All candidate details are de-identified.
Results confirmationConfirmation of results for release.
Results administration Final preparation of results for release. 
Results releaseResults are typically released mid-week and before end of day to ensure candidates can access support within business hours. 

To protect the integrity of scoresheets, robust security and quality assurance processes are in place. All scoresheets are photocopied before leaving the exam venue and are securely transported via person-to-person courier from each site. Upon arrival, the exam management supplier conducts thorough checks to confirm that all scoresheets have been received and reconciled against trainee attendance records. These steps are critical to ensuring the fairness, accuracy and reliability of results.  


Candidate feedback

All candidates receive general feedback that provides a cohort-level overview of key strengths and areas for improvement identified across the exam.

Previous years feedback reports
Member login required

We understand that you may be seeking more detailed individualised feedback; however, additional personalised feedback can't be provided. You're encouraged to discuss your results with your Advanced Training Supervisor, Director of Training or mentor, who can help you reflect on your performance, recognise your strengths and identify areas for continued development. 

To support equitable access and consistency for all candidates, the AFOEM Annual Trainees Meeting (ATM) includes sessions on the exam, preparation strategies and related processes, with opportunities for questions. 


Next steps 

In order to progress to Stage C Training, you must pass this exam and: 

Refer to the eligibility criteria and exam attempts set out in the Progression through Training Policy and the Occupational and Environmental Medicine Training Program handbook

Note: The Reconsideration Review and Appeals By-law(PDF) applies exclusively to decisions made by College bodies and doesn't apply to exam results, as these reflect outcomes of assessments against established criteria rather than discretionary decisions. 


Close overlay