Adult Medicine DCE

Overview

Key dates

Key dates

Australia

Aotearoa New Zealand

Applications open 10am AEDT, Friday 14 March 2025 10am NZDT, Friday 14 March 2025
Applications close 5pm AEDT, Monday 24 March 2025 5pm NZDT, Monday 24 March 2025
Exam date Friday 6 June to Sunday 22 June 2025
Saturday 28 June to Sunday 29 June 2025
Saturday 7 June to Sunday 8 June 2025
Friday 13 June to Sunday 15 June 2025
Results released Week beginning Monday 14 July 2025 Week beginning Monday 23 June 2025
Special Consideration  
Pre-examination applications close 5pm AEDT, Monday 24 March 2025. Refer to Appendix A of the Special Consideration for Assessment Policy (PDF)  5pm NZDT, Monday 24 March 2025. Refer to Appendix A of the Special Consideration for Assessment Policy (PDF) 
Exam day/post-examination applications close 5pm AEST, 5 days from your exam date. Applications for technical and procedural issues 5pm NZST, 5 days from your exam date. Applications for technical and procedural issues

Exam delivery

The exam is conducted in a clinical setting with real patients. RACP Fellows, staff and hospital administrators undertake extensive preparation to ensure fairness and consistency in the assessment process.

A key focus is identifying and recruiting patients with suitable case histories and features relevant to the Long or Short case assessments. Additionally, significant effort is invested in training, calibrating, and coordinating a large cohort of volunteer examiners to uphold assessment integrity and consistency.

To align with the curriculum standards, both examiners and candidates are provided with a clear understanding of the marking criteria for the Long and Short Case components. This ensures that the expected clinical performance and decision-making standards are reinforced throughout the assessment process.

Performance standard criteria

Standard-setting processes ensure that all candidates are assessed fairly and consistently. The DCE use criterion-referenced methods, meaning performance is measured against pre-determined criteria rather than a "bell curve" or a fixed passing quota. This ensures that all candidates who meet the required standard can pass.

The exam consists of Long and Short Case components. Candidates' performance in Long and Short cases is assessed using a detailed rubric that describes performance indicators across 6 levels of performance on each of the domains assessed in the case type (Long or Short). Examiners use these criteria to determine whether a candidate meets the minimum passing standard in each case.

Examiners undergo structured calibration exercises using the assessment criteria for performance to maintain consistent scoring practices across different case types and presentations.

The criteria describing different levels of performance on Long and Short case domains are available in the following document: Criteria for assessment of performance (PDF).

Marking

A score combination grid (PPTX) that combines information from candidates' performance in all cases is used to determine whether candidates have met the overall standard for the exam. This approach allows for minor variations in performance across individual cases; for example, a high standard of performance in some cases may compensate for a lower standard of performance in others.

The grid preserves performance bands, except when both Long Cases score below the minimum standard. This approach mitigates measurement errors due to examiner stringency and leniency (“hawks” and “doves”) reducing the risk of false-positive or false-negative outcomes.

This scoring system has been rigorously tested through historical data simulations, trial testing, and parallel evaluations.

We formally adopted this approach in 2019, ensuring that examiners continue to assess candidates against established performance criteria within the allocated time.

Results

Your results will be available through the Basic Training Portal and sent to you via email. For confidentiality reasons, results will not be discussed over the phone or by email. The Reconsideration, Review, and Appeals Process By-law doesn't apply to examination results.

To ensure fairness, accuracy, and integrity, results undergo a rigorous quality assurance process:

Steps post-exam day Description
Exam Data Collection Scores are submitted via the Digital Score Sheet System (DSS).
Data Verification Checking for anomalies and data comparison.
RACP Exam Analysis Data quality assurance review by Senior Lead, Assessment, and Data Analyst.
Compile Result Meeting Agenda and Documents Compile results meeting agenda, including results, item analysis, incident reports and post-exam special consideration applications.
Results Meeting Discussion of results and decision on incidents and post-exam special consideration applications. All candidate details are de-identified.
Supplementary Exam Determine if a supplementary exam is required.
Results Confirmation Confirmation of results for release.
Results Administrations Final preparation of results for release.
Results Release Results are typically released mid-week and before midday to ensure that candidates have support within business hours.

Candidate feedback

The feedback process provides comprehensive, structured, and personalised insights to support candidate reflection and improvement. Each candidate receives a detailed feedback document, which includes scores for each Long and Short Case, along with examiner comments on each assessment criterion.

  • Successful candidates receive a results letter and feedback document within 6 weeks of their results.
  • Unsuccessful candidates are offered a personalised, face-to-face feedback session with a National Examining Panel (NEP) member in Australia or a supervisor/senior examiner in Aotearoa New Zealand. These structured sessions provide a detailed performance review and guidance for improvement.

NEP members are allocated based on geographical convenience and confidentiality to ensure fairness and impartiality. Candidates may invite a supervisor, mentor, or Director of Physician Education (DPE) for additional support. DPEs receive pass/fail results for all candidates within their hospital.

Candidates may retain copies of their feedback sheets after the session; however, case summaries containing confidential patient information are not provided. Feedback sheets are strictly confidential and cannot be reproduced or distributed. Since feedback is not retained indefinitely, candidates should schedule their session promptly.

Sharing feedback outside the session is prohibited as it would breach the Academic Integrity in Training Policy.

Quality assurance

A robust quality assurance framework governs the exams to ensure fairness, accuracy, and consistency across all assessments. Each stage of the examination process follows detailed business rules tailored to the exam's purpose, format, and potential risks.

From planning and development with relevant committees to case selection and allocation, item creation, examiner recruitment, and calibration, stringent measures uphold rigorous assessment standards.

Data integrity is prioritised through comprehensive quality checks before results are finalised, while results meetings and ratification procedures provide additional oversight, particularly for candidate results close to the minimum expected standard, and whether there have been unforeseen circumstances that may impact outcomes.

Clear and timely communication ensures transparency for both candidates and stakeholders, while structured feedback mechanisms continuously refine future assessments.

Risk management and contingency planning

In addition to quality assurance, we maintain a comprehensive risk management framework to safeguard exam integrity and minimise disruptions. Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic have strengthened this framework, enhancing our ability to respond to unforeseen challenges.

Risk management plans include strategies for mitigating potential disruptions, ensuring coordinated responses to unexpected events. A crisis communications plan facilitates timely updates, while contingency plans outline alternative exam delivery methods if required.

These plans are reviewed before each exam cycle and published on our website for transparency. Through proactive risk management and rigorous quality assurance, we remain committed to upholding the highest assessment standards, providing candidates and stakeholders with confidence in the exam process.

Additionally, recommendations from the Review of Paediatric Clinical Examination in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand are being implemented to enhance exam safety for candidates, examiners, patients, and their families/whānau/carers.

To find out more, read the Review of Paediatric Clinical Examination in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand.

Support

Preparing for exams can be stressful. Reach out to the RACP Support Program for free, 24/7, completely confidential support. Make an appointment or speak with a consultant by calling 1300 687 327 (Australia) or 0800 666 367 (Aotearoa New Zealand).

The Training Support Unit is here to support your progress through your examinations. The Training Support Unit will be in contact with you to offer support and provide important information shortly after you register for the final attempt of your exam. If you're not on your final attempt of an exam and would like support from the Training Support Unit, contact us via email trainingsupport@racp.edu.au for Australian Candidates or trainingsupport@racp.org.nz for Aotearoa New Zealand candidates.

Close overlay